ORIGINAL ARTICLE
INVESTIGATION OF PRACTICAL AND THEORETICAL ACCURACY OF WIRELESS INDOOR POSITIONING SYSTEM UBISENSE
 
More details
Hide details
1
Warsaw University of Technology, Faculty of Geodesy and Cartography, Pl. Politechniki 1, 00-661 Warsaw, Poland
 
 
Online publication date: 2013-12-31
 
 
Publication date: 2013-12-01
 
 
Reports on Geodesy and Geoinformatics 2013;95:36-48
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
This paper presents the accuracy investigation results and functionality of Ubisense RTLS positioning system. Three kinds of studies were conducted: test of calibration accuracy, analysis of theoretical accuracy of the coordinates determination as well as accuracy measurements in field conditions. Test of calibration accuracy was made with several different geometric constellation of reference points (tag positions). We determined changes of orientation parameters of receivers and disturbance of positioning points coordinates against chosen reference points constellations. Analysis of theoretical accuracy was made for several receivers spatial positions and their orientations. It allowed to indicate favourable and unfavourable measurement area considering accuracy and reliability. Real positioning accuracy of the Ubisense system was determined by comparison with coordinates measured using precise tacheometer TCRP1201+. Results of conducted experiments and accuracy analysis of test measurement were presented in figures and diagrams.
 
REFERENCES (10)
1.
Coyle, L., Juan, Y., Loureiro, E., Knox, S., Dobson, S. & Nixon, P. (2007). A Proposed Approach to Evaluate the Accuracy of Tag-based Location Systems, Ubiquitous Systems Evaluation (USE 2007). Workshop at UbiComp2007, pp. 292-296, 2007.
 
2.
Curran, K., Furey, E., Lunney, T., Santos, J., Woods, D. & Mc Caughey, A. (2011). An Evaluation of Indoor Location Determination Technologies, Journal of Location Based Service Volume 5, Issue 2, 2011.
 
3.
Gremigni, O. & Porcino, D. (2006). UWB ranging performance tests in different radio environments, London Communications Symposium 2006.
 
4.
Stephan, P., Heck, I., Kraus, P. & Frey, G. (2009). Evaluation of Indoor Positioning Technologies under industrial application conditions in the SmartFactory based on EN ISO 9283, Preprints of the 13th IFAC Symposium on Information Control Problems in Manufacturing, Moscow Russia June 3 - 5, 2009.
 
5.
Liu, H., Darabi, H. , Banerjee, P. & Liu, J. (2007). Survey of Wireless Indoor Positioning Techniques and Systems, Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews, IEEE Transactions, vol. 37, issue: 6, November 2007.
 
6.
Mandeljc, R., Perš, J., Kristan, M. & Kovačič, S. (2010). An Alternative Way to Calibrate Ubisense Real-Time Location System via Multi-Camera Calibration Methods. Proceedings of the 19th International Electrotechnical and Computer Science Conference, ERK 2010, pp. 249-252.
 
7.
Muthukrishnan K. & Hazas, M. (2009). Position Estimation from UWB Pseudorange and Angle-of-Arrival: A Comparison of Non-linear Regression and Kalman Filtering, Proc., 4th Int. Symp. on Location and Context Awareness, Springer, pp. 222-239.
 
8.
Ubisense (2008-2009). LocationEngineConfig User Manual.
 
9.
Ward, A., Webster, P. & Batty, P. (2003). Local Positioning Systems - technology overview and applications, Ubisense White Paper, September 2003.
 
10.
Zhang, Y., Partridge, K. & Reich, J. (2007). Localizing Tags Using Mobile Infrastructure, Location- and Context-Awareness, Lecture Notes in Computer Science Volume 4718, pp. 279-296.
 
eISSN:2391-8152
ISSN:2391-8365
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top