ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Geoinformation modelling of the watershed area of small and medium-sized rivers for environmental audit
Iryna Omelych 1, A-F
,
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Faculty of Metallurgy, Dniprovsky State Technical University, 2, Dniprobudivska St., Kamianske 51900, Ukraine
 
2
Faculty of Geodesy and Cartography, Warsaw University of Technology, 1 Politechniki Square, Warszawa 00-661, Poland
 
 
A - Research concept and design; B - Collection and/or assembly of data; C - Data analysis and interpretation; D - Writing the article; E - Critical revision of the article; F - Final approval of article
 
 
Submission date: 2024-02-18
 
 
Final revision date: 2024-11-03
 
 
Acceptance date: 2025-01-10
 
 
Publication date: 2025-02-19
 
 
Corresponding author
Krzysztof Ireneusz Bakuła   

Faculty of Geodesy and Cartography, Warsaw University of Technology, 1 Politechniki Square, Warszawa 00-661, Poland
 
 
Reports on Geodesy and Geoinformatics 2025;119:23-29
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Developing and improving environmental audit methodologies is integral to natural resource management. This paper presents an innovative approach to studying and analysing anthropogenic impacts on the territories whose boundaries are limited by the watershed area of a small or medium-sized river. Using geoinformation technologies and high-resolution digital elevation models allowed us to create an accurate geospatial model of anthropogenic transformations of the Oril River watershed area within the Dnipropetrovsk region (Ukraine). The proposed approach to identifying potentially hazardous objects is based on surface slopes and their distance from the riverbed within the watershed area. Based on the modelling results, a refined watershed area of the Oril River with a total area of 11.1 thousand square kilometres was developed. Digitalisation and categorisation of anthropogenically transformed lands allocated for residential development, industrial enterprises, farms, agricultural land, roads, and railways within the Oril River watershed in the Dnipropetrovsk region (3963 km2) were conducted. It was found in the investigation that 79% of the study area comprises anthropogenically transformed land primarily used for agricultural and industrial activities. The modelling results underscore that agricultural activity serves as the principal source of anthropogenic pressure on the ecosystems of the studied area. The proposed improvements to the environmental audit methodology can be used in developing regulations to limit the negative impact of economic activity on the environment. This will ensure the region’s sustainable development and fulfil Ukraine’s obligations to preserve natural resources including international standards. The conclusions of the article point to the need to further improve the tools for assessing anthropogenic impact and planning environmental protection measures.
REFERENCES (34)
1.
Abrams M., Yamaguchi Y., Crippen R. (2022). ASTER GLOBAL DEM (GDEM) VERSION 3. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. XLIII-B4-2022: 593-598. doi:10.5194/isprs-archives-xliii-b4-2022-593-2022.
 
2.
Arifian Naf’an, Denis Kemal Rahman, Putri Sri K, i. (2023). COMPARISON OF ASTER GDEM IMAGES AND SRTM IMAGES FOR RIVER WATERSHED AND GEOMORPHOLOGY STUDY. International Remote Sensing Applied Journal. 3 (2): 68-73. doi:10.24036/irsaj.v3i2.38.
 
3.
Balakrishnan M., Ilanthirayan Dr. (2017). Ground Water Management And Soil Conservation Of Korayar Watershed Through Remote Sensing And GIS. 6th National Conference on Innovative Practices in Construction and Waste Management. doi:10.5281/ZENODO.579572.
 
4.
(2018). Transport facilities. Railways track 1520 mm. Design standards. Ministry of Regional Development of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine, 102 [in Ukrainian].
 
5.
(2018). Streets and roads of settlements. Ministry of Regional Development of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine, 55 [in Ukrainian].
 
6.
(2024). https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/.
 
7.
(2020). Law of Ukraine No. 1862-IV, Kyiv, Ukraine. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1862-15#Text.
 
8.
Fedonenko E. V., Kunakh O. M., Chubchenko Y. A., Zhukov O. V. (2022). Application of remote sensing data for monitoring eutrophication of floodplain water bodies. Biosystems Diversity. 30 (2): 179-190. doi:10.15421/012219.
 
9.
Feketa I. Y. (2016). Methodical Recommendations for the Course "Environmental Expertise and Audit" (for students of the specialty 7.04010401 ’Geography’) [in Ukrainian].
 
10.
Guth P. L. (2010). Geomorphometric comparison of aster GDEM and SRTM. Proceedings of the Part 4th ISPRS Archives A Special Joint Symposium of ISPRS Technical Commission IV and AutoCarto in Conjunction with ASPRS/CaGIS 2010 Fall Specialty Conference.
 
11.
Hnativ I. R. (2022). Assessment of Technogenic Impact on the Hydrosphere Considering the Principles of Watershed Management [in Ukrainian].
 
12.
(2023). Land Code of Ukraine [in Ukrainian]. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2768-14#Text.
 
13.
Lomtatidze N. (2017). Ecological Expertise, Audit, Control.
 
14.
Okhremenko I. V. (2017). Theoretical and Methodological Aspects of Environmental Audit of Island Territories (on the Example of Bilohrudiv Island) [in Ukrainian]. Scientific Bulletin of Kherson State University. Series: Geographic Sciences. : 160-163.
 
15.
Omelych Iryna, Neposhyvailenko Natalia, Zberovskyi Oleks, r, Korniienko Iryna. (2021). Improvement of the methodology for the assessment of soil biogenic pollution through the use of geoecological approaches and the use of information technologies. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies. 3 (10(111)): 42-53. doi:10.15587/1729-4061.2021.235845.
 
16.
Parpan V. I., Mylenka M. M. (2010). Methodological aspects of assessing the ecological state of urbanised and technologically altered territories [in Ukrainian]. Biosystems Diversity. 18 (2): 61-68. doi:10.15421/011027.
 
17.
(2023). Law of Ukraine No. 1264-XII, Kyiv, Ukraine. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1264-12#Text.
 
18.
Ran Lishan, Lu X. X. (2011). Delineation of reservoirs using remote sensing and their storage estimate: An example of the Yellow River basin, China. Hydrological Processes. 26 (8): 1215-1229. doi:10.1002/hyp.8224.
 
19.
Rusina N., Lyul'chyk V., Bida P., Kachanovs'kyy O., Bulakevych S., Petrova O. (2021). Problems of installation water protective zones and coastal protective stripes. Zemleustrìj, kadastr ì monìtorìng zemel'. (3): 6-6. doi:10.31548/zemleustriy2021.03.06.
 
20.
Rybalova Olga, Artemiev Sergey. (2017). Development of a procedure for assessing the environmental risk of the surface water status deterioration. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies. 5 (10 (89)): 67-76. doi:10.15587/1729-4061.2017.112211.
 
21.
Shen Yuan, Cao Huiming, Tang Mingfang, Deng Hongbing. (2017). The Human Threat to River Ecosystems at the Watershed Scale: An Ecological Security Assessment of the Songhua River Basin, Northeast China. Water. 9 (3): 219-219. doi:10.3390/w9030219.
 
22.
Sherstiuk M. M. (2023). Assessment of Technogenic Impact on the Hydrosphere Considering the Principles of Watershed Management [in Ukrainian].
 
23.
Tretyak K., Kukhtar D. (2022). Ice Glacier Velocity Determination Using Sentinel-1 Data: A Case Study on Wiggins Glacier, West Antarctica, 2015–2017. International Conference of Young Professionals «GeoTerrace-2022». 1-5. doi:10.3997/2214-4609.2022590004.
 
24.
Vasenko O., Rybalova O. V., Artemiev. (2015). Integrated and Comprehensive Assessments of the State of the Natural Environment: Monograph [in Ukrainian]. NUHZU, Kharkiv, Ukraine.
 
25.
Vivian A., Enweluzor O., Abdulwaheed Y. (2023). Extraction of watershed characteristics in Imo state using GIS and Digital Elevation Model.
 
26.
(2022). Water Code of Ukraine [in Ukrainian]. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/213/95-вр#Text.
 
27.
Wu Xiaolan, Bu Xiaoyan, Dong Suocheng, Ma Yushuang, Ma Yan, Ma Yarong, Liu Yulian, Wang Haixian, Wang Xiaomin, Wang Jiarui. (2023). The impact of restoration and protection based on sustainable development goals on urban wetland health: A case of Yinchuan plain urban wetland ecosystem, Ningxia, China. Sustainability. 15 (16): 12287-12287. doi:10.3390/su151612287.
 
28.
Xiong Mingliang. (2022). An empirical study on the moderating effect of environmental audit on the impact of economic development and ecological environment. Frontiers in Psychology. 13. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1047517.
 
29.
Yakymchuk Alina, Pavlov Kostiantyn, Pavlova Olena, Golubchuk Ihor. (2023). ECONOMIC FOUNDATIONS OF RESOURCE CONSERVATION IN UKRAINE: FOREIGN EXPERIENCE. Herald of Khmelnytskyi National University. Economic sciences. 318 (3): 163-168. doi:10.31891/2307-5740-2023-318-3-25.
 
30.
Yemelyanova D. I. (2017). Assessment of Environmental Safety of Natural-Technogenic Objects Based on Informational and Methodological Support [in Ukrainian].
 
31.
Zavalniuk I. V. (2004). Environmental Audit of Territories (on the Example of the Plain Crimea) [in Ukrainian].
 
32.
Zavalniuk I. V. (2008). Environmental Audit of Territories: Methodical Implementation Peculiarities [in Ukrainian]. Geography in the Information Society. 4: 129-130.
 
33.
Zhai Liang, Cheng Siyuan, Sang Huiyong, Xie Wenhan, Gan Lin, Wang Tengbo. (2022). Remote sensing evaluation of ecological restoration engineering effect: A case study of the Yongding River Watershed, China. Ecological Engineering. 182: 106724-106724. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2022.106724.
 
34.
Zhang Quan, Yang Qinke, Wang Chunmei. (2016). SRTM Error Distribution and its Associations with Landscapes across China. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing. 82 (2): 135-148. doi:10.14358/pers.83.2.135.
 
eISSN:2391-8152
ISSN:2391-8365
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top