ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Methodology for geoinformation modeling of microelement distribution in surface waters: Case study of the Poltava Region (Ukraine)
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Geoinformatics and Photogrammetry, Faculty of Geoinformation Systems and Land Management, Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture, 31 Povitroflotsky Avenue, 03037, Kyiv, Ukraine
 
 
A - Research concept and design; B - Collection and/or assembly of data; C - Data analysis and interpretation; D - Writing the article; E - Critical revision of the article; F - Final approval of article
 
 
Submission date: 2025-01-30
 
 
Final revision date: 2025-05-24
 
 
Acceptance date: 2025-07-16
 
 
Publication date: 2025-07-25
 
 
Corresponding author
Andrii Volodymyrovych Klypa   

Department of Geoinformatics and Photogrammetry, Faculty of Geoinformation Systems and Land Management, Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture, 31 Povitroflotsky Avenue, 03037, Kyiv, Ukraine
 
 
Reports on Geodesy and Geoinformatics 2025;120:25-30
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The article presents an analysis of current research focused on the use of geoinformation technologies for environmental monitoring. A methodology for geoinformation modeling of microelement distribution in surface waters was developed and tested using the example of the Poltava region. The methodology includes stages of preliminary data processing, interpolation using the Triangulated Irregular Network (TIN) method, and spatial analysis of the obtained results. Based on the modeling outcomes, a cartographic model was created that enabled the identification of areas with elevated barium content. It was established that the area of such zones increased from 4.24% to 37.55% in the period 1991-1993 compared to 1985-1988. A generalized scheme for the environmental assessment of impact on natural components was proposed, which can be adapted to monitoring the condition of water bodies in various regions. The proposed approach can be used to assess anthropogenic pressure, including the impact of military actions, on the quality of surface waters.
REFERENCES (14)
1.
Aydöner, C. (2024). Development and application of a GIS tool in the design of surface water quality monitoring networks: A microwatershed–based approach. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 196(10), doi:10.1007/s10661-024-13193-x.
 
2.
Bilolikar Divya K, More Aishwarya, Gong Aella, Janssen Joseph. (2023). How to out-perform default random forest regression: choosing hyperparameters for applications in large-sample hydrology. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.07136.
 
3.
Derzhspozhyvstandart Ukrainy (2007). Dzherela tsentralizovanoho pytnoho vodopostachannia. Hihienichni ta ekolohichni vymohy shchodo yakosti vody i pravila vybyrannia (Centralized drinking water sources. Hygienic and ecological requirements for water quality and sampling rules). Kyiv.
 
4.
Jha DK, Das AK, Saravanane N, Abdul Nazar AK, Kirubagaran R. (2010). Sensitivity of GIS-based interpolation techniques in assessing water quality parameters of Port Blair Bay, Andaman. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of India. 52 (1): 55-61.
 
5.
Klymchuk V. (2019). HIS v ekolohichnomu monitorynhu vodoim Ukrainy (GIS in environmental monitoring of Ukraine’s water bodies). Visnyk ekolohichnoi bezpeky -- Bulletin of Environmental Safety. 2: 45-58.
 
6.
Maliqi, E. and Penev, P. (2019). Spatial Representation Of Surface Water Monitoring And Its Assessment Using Geostatistical And Non-Geostatistical Techniques In GIS. Geodesy and cartography, 45(4):177–189, doi:10.3846/gac.2019.8590.
 
7.
Ministerstvo okhorony zdorovia Ukrainy (2010). Derzhavni sanitarni normy ta pravila "Hihienichni vymohy do vody pytnoi, pryznachenoi dlia spozhyvannia liudynoiu" (State sanitary norms and rules "Hygienic requirements for drinking water intended for human consumption"). DSanPiN 2.2.4-171-10.
 
8.
Nisansala, K. (2022). Evaluation of Different Interpolation Techniques in GIS for Rainfall Data in Sri Lanka (2013-2018) and Identification of the Validation of the Techniques. Proceedings of International Forestry and Environment Symposium, 26, doi:10.31357/fesympo.v26.5767.
 
9.
Oztuna Aybars. (2023). Environmental Analysis Using Integrated GIS and Spatial Configurations in Israel. Journal of Geographic Information System. 15 (02): 267–293-267–293.
 
10.
Pal Dolgobinda, Saha Sarathi, Mukherjee Aishi, Sarkar Piyali, Banerjee Saon, Mukherjee Asis. (2025). GIS-Based Modeling for Water Resource Monitoring and Management: A Critical Review. In: Surface, Sub-Surface Hydrology and Management. 537–561-537–561. Springer Nature Switzerland. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-62376-9ES_DASH24.
 
11.
Parra, L. (2022). Remote Sensing and GIS in Environmental Monitoring. Applied Sciences, 12(16):8045, doi:10.3390/app12168045.
 
12.
Semenchuk M. R. (2022). Triangulated irregular network interpolation method in spatial analysis. Connectivity. 156 (2). doi:10.31673/2412-9070.2022.026269.
 
13.
Shukla, B. K., Gupta, L., Parashar, B., Sharma, P. K., Sihag, P., and Shukla, A. K. (2025). Integrative Assessment of Surface Water Contamination Using GIS, WQI, and Machine Learning in Urban–Industrial Confluence Zones Surrounding the National Capital Territory of the Republic of India. Water, 17(7):1076, doi:10.3390/w17071076.
 
14.
Tamilenthi S, Baskaran R, Mohan K Ch, ra. (2011). Triangulated Irregular Network (TIN) Model For Water Resource Management For The Sustainable Development Of Kottakarai Aru Water Shed, Tamil Nadu, India. Journal of Environmental Research And Development. 6 (2): 837-845.
 
eISSN:2391-8152
ISSN:2391-8365
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top