ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Do geographic location and historical conditions affect the quality and availability of open cadastral data? From early cadastral maps till now
 
More details
Hide details
1
Faculty of Geo-Data Science, Geodesy, and Environmental Engineering, Department of Integrated Geodesy and Cartography, AGH University of Science and Technology, 30 Mickiewicza St., 30-059 Krakow, Poland
 
2
Faculty of Technical Engineering, State University of Applied Sciences in Jaroslaw, 16 Czarnieckiego St., 37-500 Jarosław, Poland
 
3
Department of Land Cadaster, Faculty of Land Management and Tourism, Lviv National Envinronmental University, 1 Volodymyr Velykyi str., 80-381 Dubliany, Ukraine
 
4
Institute of Earth Sciences, University of Silesia in Katowice, 12 Bankowa St., 40-007 Katowice, Poland
 
5
Global Justice Program, Yale University, P.O. Box 208306, New Haven, Connecticut, 06520-8306, USA
 
6
Hainan University - Arizona State University Joint International Tourism College, 570228 Haiyun Middle Rd, Meilan District, Haikou, Hainan, China
 
7
Center for Tourism Research, Wakayama University, Wakayama 640-8510, Japan
 
 
Submission date: 2023-08-08
 
 
Acceptance date: 2023-10-12
 
 
Publication date: 2023-11-14
 
 
Corresponding author
Michal Apollo   

Institute of Earth Sciences, University of Silesia in Katowice, 12 Bankowa St., 40-007 Katowice, Poland
 
 
Reports on Geodesy and Geoinformatics 2023;116:23-38
 
HIGHLIGHTS
  • History and geographical location can slow down the development of OCD but cannot stop it.
  • Poland and Ukraine share data in geoportals based on ISO19.100 standard.
  • OCD is publicly available on 21 and 15 thematic layers in Poland and Ukraine, respectively.
  • Both countries have achieved modern standards of OCD and its accessibility.
  • Russia's aggression against Ukraine has halted the process in Ukraine.
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Since the early days, cadastral data represent the geographic extent of the past, current, and future rights and interests in real property. Thus, these data are extremely important for the proper development of statehood and society. The article analyses the process of formation of the real estate cadastre in two countries -- Poland and Ukraine -- from the time of its establishment to the present. Both countries were in the past (and Ukraine still is) victims of various historical events that deprived them of statehood, stability and opportunities for development; therefore, it affected the development of the cadastre and its accessibility to all stakeholders. The authors attempt to answer the question of if and how geographic location and historical conditions can affect the quality and availability of open cadastral data (OCD). After all, our perception of reality is a direct result of processes originating in history. This paper contains comparisons between a post-Soviet (Ukraine) and a post-communist country (Poland) and their path from early cadastral maps to OCD.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The article was prepared under the research subvention of AGH University No. 16.16.150.545.
 
REFERENCES (63)
1.
Abramic, A., Kotsev, A., Cetl, V., Kephalopoulos, S., and Paviotti, M. (2017). A spatial data infrastructure for environmental noise data in Europe. International journal of environmental research and public health, 14(7):726,doi:10.3390/ijerph14070726.
 
2.
Act (1971). The Act of October 26, 1971 on the regulation of farm ownership. Act. Journal of Laws, No. 27, item 250, Poland.
 
3.
Act (1989). Act of May 17, 1989 Geodetic and Cartographic Law. Act. Journal of Laws, 2020, item 276, Poland.
 
4.
Act (1990). Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine „On land reform”. Offcial Website of the Parliament of Ukraine. No. 563-XII. Last accessed August 2023.
 
5.
Act (1992a). Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine „On Forms of Land Ownership”. Offcial Website of the Parliament of Ukraine. No. 2073-XII. Last accessed August 2023.
 
6.
Act (1992b). The Law of Ukraine „On the Basics of Urban Planning”. Offcial Website of the Parliament of Ukraine. No. 2780-XII. Last accessed August 2023.
 
7.
Act (1997). Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine „On the Program for the Creation of an Automated System for Maintaining the State Land Cadastre”. Offcial Website of the Parliament of Ukraine. No. 1355-97-n. Last accessed August 2023.
 
8.
Act (2001). Land Code of Ukraine. Offcial Website of the Parliament of Ukraine. No. 2768-III. Last accessed August 2023.
 
9.
Act (2010). Act on Spatial Data Infrastructure of 4 March 2010. Act. Journal of Laws, 2010, No. 76, item 489, Poland.
 
10.
Act (2012). Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine „On approval of the procedure for maintaining the State Land Cadastre”. Offcial Website of the Parliament of Ukraine. No. 1051-2012. Last accessed August 2023.
 
11.
Act (2020). Act of June 19, 2020 on interest subsidies on bank loans granted to entrepreneurs a ected by COVID-19 and on simplified proceedings for approval of an arrangement in connection with the occurrence of COVID-19. Act. Journal of Laws, 2020, item 1086, Poland.
 
12.
Act (2021). Law of Ukraine „On the State Land Cadastre”. Offcial Website of the Parliament of Ukraine. No. 3613-17. Last accessed August 2023.
 
13.
Antoine, C. (2007). French cadastre. From the beginnings tothe present day. Technical report.
 
14.
Apollo, M., Jakubiak, M., Nistor, S., Lewińska, P., Krawczyk, A., Borowski, Ł., Specht, M., Krzykowska-Piotrowska, K., Marchel, Ł., Pęska-Siwik, A., Kardos, M., and Maciuk, K. (2023). Geodata in science – a review of selected scientific fields. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Formatio Circumiectus, 22(2), doi:10.15576/ASP.FC/2023.22.2.02.
 
15.
Balawejder, M., Adamczyk, T., and Cygan, M. (2016). The problem of adjusting polish spatial information resources to the standards of the INSPIRE. volume 11. Geographic Information Systems Conference and Exhibition “GIS ODYSSEY 2016”, 5th to 9th of September 2016, Perugia, Italy.
 
16.
Bieda, A., Bydłosz, J., and Parzych, P. (2013). Actualization of data concerning surface flowing waters, basing on INSPIRE directive requirements. Geomatics and Environmental Engineering, 1(7), doi:10.7494/geom.2013.7.1.25.
 
17.
Bieda, A., Bydłosz, J., Warchoł, A., and Balawejder, M. (2020). Historical underground structures as 3D cadastral objects. Remote Sensing, 12(10):1547, doi:10.3390/rs12101547.
 
18.
Brönnimann, F., Šestić, M., González Pérez, P., Haugan, F., Magdalinski, N., Miserez, K., Pfa nger, N., Ritschl, J., Schwarzbach, F., Vanbockryck, J., and Alos, A. L. (2013). D2. 8. III. 6 INSPIRE Data Speci¬cation on Utility and Government Services – Technical Guidelines. Technical report.
 
19.
Buśko, M. and Apollo, M. (2023). Public administration and landowners facing real estate cadastre modernization: A win-lose or win-win situation? Resources, 12(6):73, doi:10.3390/resources12060073.
 
20.
Buśko, M. and Meusz, A. (2014). Current status of real estate cadastre in Poland with reference to historical conditions of different regions of the country. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Environmental Engineering, volume 9, page 1. Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, 22–23 May 2014, Vilnius, Lithuania, doi:10.3846/enviro.2014.196.
 
21.
Buśko, M. (2017). Intended use of a building in terms of updating the cadastral database and harmonizing the data with other public records. Reports on Geodesy and Geoinformatics, 103(1):78–93, doi:10.1515/rgg-2017-0007.
 
22.
Buśko, M., Zyga, J., Hudecová, L., Kysel’, P., Balawejder, M., and Apollo, M. (2022). Active collection of data in the real estate cadastre in systems with a di erent pedigree and a different way of building development: Learning from Poland and Slovakia. Sustainability, 14(22):15046, doi:10.3390/su142215046.
 
23.
Capolupo, A., Monterisi, C., Saponieri, A., Addona, F., Damiani, L., Archetti, R., and Tarantino, E. (2021). An interactive WebGIS framework for coastal erosion risk management. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 9(6):567, doi:10.3390/jmse9060567.
 
24.
Cienciała, A. (2018). Selected issues concerning management of historical immovable properties in Poland and other European countries. GIS Odyssey 2018, 10–14 September 2018, Perugia, Italy.
 
25.
Cienciała, A. and Florek-Paszkowski, R. (2019). The use of surveying and photogrammetric court evidence in the usucaption procedures for proving the acquisition of the ownership of real estate. Geomatics and Environmental Engineering, 13(4):5–15, doi:10.7494/geom.2019.13.4.5.
 
26.
Çoruhlu, Y. E. and Çelik, M. Ö. (2022). Protected area geographical management model from design to implementation for specially protected environment area. Land Use Policy, 122:106357, doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106357.
 
27.
Dale, P. and McLaughlin, J. (2000). Land administration. Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oso/9780198233909.001.0001.
 
28.
Dawidowicz, A., Kulawiak, M., Zysk, E., and Kocur-Bera, K. (2020). System architecture of an INSPIRE-compliant green cadastre system for the EU Member State of Poland. Re-mote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 20:100362, doi:10.1016/j.rsase.2020.100362.
 
29.
Decree (1944). The Decree of the Polish Committee of National Liberation of September 6, 1944 on the implementation of the land reform. Act. Journal of Laws, Poland.
 
30.
Decree (2001). The Decree of the Minister of Regional Development and Construction of 29 March 2001 on the land and building register – provision not in force. Act. Journal of Laws, No. 38 item 454, Poland.
 
31.
Doomsday Book (1086). Doomsday Book.
 
32.
Fedorowski, W. (1974). Ewidencja gruntów. PPWK.
 
33.
Femenia-Ribera, C., Mora-Navarro, G., and Pérez, L. J. S. (2022). Evaluating the use of old cadastral maps. Land Use Policy, 114:105984, doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.105984.
 
34.
Gao, Y., Janssen, M., and Zhang, C. (2023). Understanding the evolution of open government data research: towards open data sustainability and smartness. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 89(1):59–75, doi:10.1177/002085232110099.
 
35.
Hersperger, A. M., Thurnheer-Wittenwiler, C., Tobias, S., Folvig, S., and Fertner, C. (2022). Digitalization in land-use planning: effects of digital plan data on eficiency, transparency and innovation. European Planning Studies, 30(12):2537–2553, doi:10.1080/09654313.2021.2016640.
 
36.
INSPIRE (2007). Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community (INSPIRE).
 
37.
Instructions (1904). Instrukction Zür Ausführung der trigonometrischen und polygonomertichen Vermessungen behufs herstelung neper Pläne für die Zweckedes Grundsteuer-Katasters (Instructions for carrying out trigonometric and polygonometric measurements in order to produce plans for the purposes of the property tax cadastre).
 
38.
Instructions (1907). Instruktion Grundsteuerkatasters (Instructions for the property tax cadastre). Publishing house of the K. K. Lithographic Institute of the property tax cadastre from the K. K. Hof and State Printing Office. Vienna.
 
39.
Janečka, K. and Souček, P. (2017). A country profile of the Czech Republic based on an LADM for the development of a 3D cadastre. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 6(5):143, doi:10.3390/ijgi6050143.
 
40.
Kain, R. J. (1975). Tithe surveys and landownership. Journal of Historical Geography, 1(1):39–48, doi:10.1016/0305-7488(75)90074-2.
 
41.
Kotsev, A., Peeters, O., Smits, P., and Grothe, M. (2015). Building bridges: experiences and lessons learned from the implementation of INSPIRE and e-reporting of air quality data in Europe. Earth Science Informatics, 8:353–365, doi:10.1007/s12145-014-0160-8.
 
42.
Larsson, G. (1991). Land registration and cadastral systems: tools for land information and management. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.
 
43.
Macedo, D. F. and Lemos, D. L. d. S. (2022). Government open data: initiatives and challenges in data opening in Brazil and other international spheres. AtoZ: novas práticas em informação e conhecimento, 10(2):14–26, doi:10.5380/atoz.v10i2.77737.
 
44.
Maciuk, K., Peska-Siwik, A., El-Mowafy, A., Borowski, L., and Apollo, M. (2021). Crustal deformation across and beyond Central Europe and its impact on land boundaries. Resources, 10(2):15, doi:10.3390/resources10020015.
 
45.
Nava, F. P., Berriel, I. S., Nava, A. P., Rodríguez, V. G., and Morera, J. P. (2022). Promoting the heritage of the city of San Cristobal de la laguna through a temporal link with a 16th century map. Virtual Archaeology Review, 13(26):62–75, doi:10.4995/var.2022.15322.
 
46.
Ogryzek, M., Podawca, K., and Cienciała, A. (2022). Geospatial tools in the analyses of land use in the perspective of the accessibility of selected educational services in Poland. Land Use Policy, 122:106373, doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106373.
 
47.
Ogryzek, M., Tarantino, E., and Rząsa, K. (2020). Infrastructure of the spatial information in the european community (INSPIRE) based on examples of Italy and Poland. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(12):755, doi:10.3390/ijgi9120755.
 
48.
Radulović, A., Sladić, D., and Govedarica, M. (2017). Towards 3D cadastre in serbia: Development of serbian cadastral domain model. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 6(10):312, doi:10.3390/ijgi6100312.
 
49.
Reczyńska, J. and Hanus, P. (2020). Legal aspects of registration the time of cadastral data creation or modification. Reports on Geodesy and Geoinformatics, 110(1):9–17, doi:10.2478/rgg-2020-0007.
 
50.
Regulation (1924). The Regulation of the Minister of Agricultural Reform of June 2. Act. Journal of Laws, Poland.
 
51.
Regulation (2001). Regulation of the Minister of Regional Development and Construction of March 29, 2001 on the register of land and buildings. Journal of Laws 2001, No. 38, item 454, Poland.
 
52.
Regulation (2021). Regulation of the Minister of Development, Labor and Technology of July 27, 2021 on the register of land and buildings. Journal of Laws 2021, item 1390, Poland.
 
53.
Ruijer, E., Détienne, F., Baker, M., Groff, J., and Meijer, A. J. (2020). The politics of open government data: Understanding organizational responses to pressure for more transparency. The American review of public administration, 50(3):260–274, doi:10.1177/027507401988806.
 
54.
Silva, M. A. and Stubkjær, E. (2002). A review of methodologies used in research on cadastral development. Computers, environment and urban systems, 26(5):403–423, doi:10.1016/S0198-9715(02)00011-X.
 
55.
Sobolewska-Mikulska, K. and Cienciała, A. (2020). Legal-surveying documentation in the registration of rights to properties of the treasury and of territorial self-government units – case study of Poland. Real Estate Management and Valuation, 28(2):76–88, doi:10.1515/remav-2020-0017.
 
56.
Sossa, R. (2020). Geodesy, cartography and aerial photography.
 
57.
Szafranska, B., Buśko, M., Kovalyshyn, O., and Kolodiy, P. (2020). Building a spatial information system to support the development of agriculture in Poland and Ukraine. Agronomy, 10(12):1884, doi:10.3390/agronomy10121884.
 
58.
Szopińska, K., Balawejder, M., and Warchoł, A. (2022). National legal regulations and location of noise barriers along the Polish highway. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 109:103359, doi:10.1016/j.trd.2022.103359.
 
59.
Taszakowski, J. (2011). Ocena przydatności map byłego katastru austriackiego dla regulacji stanu prawnego nieruchomości w południowej Polsce (Usabilities evaluation of cadastral maps of former Austrian cadastre for real estate legal status regulation in southern Poland). Infrastruktura i Ekologia Terenów Wiejskich, (4).
 
60.
Wang, V. and Shepherd, D. (2020). Exploring the extent of openness of open government data – a critique of open government datasets in the UK. Government Information Quarterly, 37(1):101405, doi:10.1016/j.giq.2019.101405.
 
61.
Williamson, I., Enemark, S., Wallace, J., and Rajabifard, A. (2010). Land administration for sustainable development.
 
62.
Williamson, I. P. (2001). Land administration “best practice” providing the infrastructure for land policy implementation. Land Use Policy, 18(4):297–307, doi:10.1016/S0264-8377(01)00021-7.
 
63.
Zevenbergen, J. (2002). Systems of land registration aspects and effects. PhD thesis, Civil Engineering and Geosciences, TU Delft.
 
eISSN:2391-8152
ISSN:2391-8365
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top