ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Unreliability of cadastral data on parcel area and its effect on sustainable real estate valuation
1
Faculty of Environmental Engineering, Geomatics and Renewable Energy, Kielce University of Technology, al.
Tysiąclecia Państwa Polskiego 7, 25-314 Kielce, Poland
2
Faculty of Geodesy and Cartography, Warsaw University of Technology, Plac Politechniki 1, 00-661 Warsaw, Poland
Submission date: 2023-09-17
Acceptance date: 2023-10-23
Publication date: 2023-11-29
Corresponding author
Natalia Sajnóg
Faculty of Geodesy and Cartography, Warsaw University of Technology, Plac Politechniki 1, 00-661 Warsaw, Poland
Faculty of Geodesy and Cartography, Warsaw University of Technology, Plac Politechniki 1, 00-661 Warsaw, Poland
Reports on Geodesy and Geoinformatics 2023;116:39-46
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Appropriate and sustainable management of land is required to the preserve spatial order and the appropriate use of resources. To make quality decisions in space, as well as to actively manage a resource, it is crucial to be able to use, among others, credible, up-to-date spatial details, including the cadastral data. The question is, however, whether the data inscribed in the cadastre correspond to reality. Among others, the problem of considerable differences between recorded, cadastral and geodetic area (reflecting actual circumstances) of the parcels can be commonly observed, influencing the procedure of real estate appraisal. This research examines the scale of the problem of unreliability of cadastral data regarding the area of parcels. Based on the example of a middle-sized city, analyses of the scale of the problem and an investigation of the types of properties most commonly involved were conducted. Moreover, an analysis of legal acts in force and those already expired, as well as the literature on the subject was performed to determine the permissible differences in the area between relevant records. The influence of the unreliable cadastral data on the procedure of appraisal of real estates was also investigated.
REFERENCES (49)
1.
Bajtala, M., Hudecová, L., and Sokol, Š. (2017). The reliability of parcel area. Proceedings of the International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management SGEM2017, Albena, Bulgaria, 17:689–696.
2.
Benduch, P. (2016). The assessment of the influence of cadastral parcel boundary points location errors on the accuracy of analytical determination of their surface area. Geomatics and Environmental Engineering, 10(1):17–31, doi:10.7494/geom.2016.10.1.17.
3.
Bieda, A., Hanus, P., Jasińska, E., and Preweda, E. (2014). Accuracy of determination of real estate area. The 9th International Conference “Environmental Engineering”, 22–23 May 2014, Vilnius, Lithuania, doi:10.3846/enviro.2014.191.
4.
Bielecka, E. (2010). Zasady oceny jakości danych przestrzennych oraz ich zastosowanie do oceny jakości danych gromadzonych w TBD (Rules for the assessment of spatial data and their application to assess the quality of data collected in the Topographic Databases). Roczniki Geomatyki, 8(4):53–66.
5.
Bryx, M. (2006). Rynek nieruchomości: system i funkcjonowanie (The Real Estate Market: System and Function). Wydawnictwo Poltext.
6.
Busko, M. and Apollo, M. (2023). Public administration and landowners facing real estate cadastre modernization: A win-lose or win-win situation? Resources, 12(6):73, doi:10.3390/resources12060073.
7.
Busko, M., Zyga, J., Hudecová, L., Kysel’, P., Balawejder, M., and Apollo, M. (2022). Active collection of data in the real estate cadastre in systems with a different pedigree and a different way of building development: Learning from Poland and Slovakia. Sustainability, 14(22):15046, doi:10.3390/su142215046.
8.
Chekole, S. D., de Vries, W. T., Durán-Díaz, P., and Shibeshi, G. B. (2020). Performance evaluation of the urban cadastral system in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Land, 9(12):505, doi:10.3390/land9120505.
9.
Cienciała, A., Sobolewska-Mikulska, K., and Sobura, S. (2021). Credibility of the cadastral data on land use and the methodology for their verification and update. Land Use Policy, 102:105204, doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105204.
10.
Dąbrowski, R. and Latos, D. (2015). Possibilities of the practical application of remote sensing data in real property appraisal. Real Estate Management and Valuation, 23(2):68–76, doi:10.1515/remav-2015-0016.
11.
Dawidowicz, A. and Źróbek, R. (2018). A methodological evaluation of the Polish cadastral system based on the global cadastral model. Land use policy, 73:59–72, doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.01.037.
12.
Doskocz, A. (2011). Dokładność obliczania pola powierzchni ze współrzędnych płaskich prostokątnych (Accuracy of calculation of a surface area from plane orthogonal coordinates). Acta Scientiarum Polonorum. Geodesia et Descriptio Terrarum, 10(3):29–43.
13.
Foryś, I. and Gaca, R. (2020). Objective and subjective perception of real estate features in the light of an experimental study. In Nermend, K. and Łatuszyńska, M., editors, Experimental and Quantitative Methods in Contemporary Economics: Computational Methods in Experimental Economics (CMEE) 2018 Conference, Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham, pages 265–275. Springer, doi:10.1007/978-3-030-30251-1_19.
14.
French, N. and Gabrielli, L. (2004). The uncertainty of valuation. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 22(6):484–500, doi:10.1108/14635780410569470.
15.
Friedmann, J. (2004). Strategic spatial planning and the longer range. Planning Theory & Practice, 5(1):49–67, doi:10.1080/1464935042000185062.
16.
Gilbertson, B. (2001). Valuation or appraisal: an art or a science? Real Estate Issues, 26(3):86–89.
17.
GUGiK (2019). Summary statement from 2019. Head Office of Geodesy and Cartography (GUGiK), Warsaw, Poland.
18.
GUS (2023). Główny Urząd Statystyczny (Statistics Poland). On-line, Last accessed: 2023.08.21.
19.
Hanus, P., Pęska-Siwik, A., Benduch, P., and Szewczyk, R. (2020). Comprehensive assessment of the quality of spatial data in records of parcel boundaries. Measurement, 158:107665, doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2020.107665.
20.
Hopfer, A. (1994). The relationship between the cadastre and land valuation. In FIG XX International Congress, Melbourne, Australia.
21.
Hubar, Y., Vynarchyk, L., Sai, V., and Bochkov, S. (2021). Methods to determine the area of the land plot physical surface. In International Conference of Young Professionals "GeoTerrace-2021", volume 2021, pages 1–5. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, doi:10.3997/2214-4609.20215K3043.
22.
Janowski, A., Renigier-Biłozor, M., Walacik, M., and Chmielewska, A. (2021). Remote measurement of building usable floor area–algorithms fusion. Land Use Policy, 100:104938, doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104938.
23.
Jasińska, E. (2014). Real estate due diligence on the example of the Polish market. 14th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Geoconference (SGEM2014), Albena, Bulgaria, 2:17–26, doi:10.5593/SGEM2014/B22/S9.053.
24.
Kocur-Bera, K. (2016). Determinants of agricultural land price in Poland – a case study covering a part of the Euroregion Baltic. Cahiers Agricultures, 25(2):25004, doi:10.1051/cagri/2016013.
25.
Kocur-Bera, K. (2019). Data compatibility between the Land and Building Cadaster (LBC) and the Land Parcel Identification System (LPIS) in the context of area-based payments: A case study in the Polish Region of Warmia and Mazury. Land use policy, 80:370–379, doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.09.024.
26.
Kocur-Bera, K. (2020). Understanding information about agricultural land. an evaluation of the extent of data modification in the Land Parcel Identification System for the needs of area-based payments – a case study. Land Use Policy, 94:104527, doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104527.
27.
Kocur-Bera, K. and Frąszczak, H. (2021). Coherence of cadastral data in land management—a case study of rural areas in Poland. Land, 10(4):399, doi:10.3390/land10040399.
28.
Kononova, O. Y. and Zatolokina, N. (2020). Cadastral challenges of forest resource surveying in Belgorod oblast. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, volume 459, page 042040. IOP Publishing, doi:10.1088/1755-1315/459/4/042040.
29.
Krajewska, M., Źróbek, S., and Kovač, M. Š. (2014). The role of spatial planning in the investment process in Poland and Slovenia. Real Estate Management and Valuation, 22(2):52–66, doi:10.2478/remav-2014-0017.
30.
Krigsholm, P., Zavialova, S., Riekkinen, K., Ståhle, P., and Viitanen, K. (2017). Understanding the future of the Finnish cadastral system – a Delphi study. Land Use Policy, 68:133–140, doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.07.032.
31.
Kucharska-Stasiak, E. (2013). Uncertainty of property valuation as a subject of academic research. Real Estate Management and Valuation, 21(4):17–25, doi:10.2478/remav-2013-0033.
32.
Law (1989). Law of May 17, 1989 Geodetic and Cartographic Law. Act. Journal of Laws, No. 2021.0.1990, Poland.
33.
Law (1997). Law of August 21, 1997 On Real Estate Management. Act. Journal of Laws, No. 2023.344.1113, Poland.
34.
Matko, V. (2008). Mass appraisal of agricultural land. Geodetski Vestnik, 52(3):520–529.
35.
Mika, M. (2017). Interoperability cadastral data in the system approach. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 18(2), doi:10.12911/22998993/68303.
36.
Noga, K., Balawejder, M., and Matkowska, K. (2017). Dimensions of destruction of road network providing access to cadastral parcels resulting from motorway construction. Geomatics and Environmental Engineering, 11(4):65–81, doi:10.7494/geom.2017.11.4.65.
37.
Noszczyk, T. and Hernik, J. (2019). Understanding the cadastre in rural areas in Poland after the socio-political transformation. Journal of spatial science, 64(1):73–95, doi:10.1080/14498596.2017.1404500.
38.
Ogryzek, M., Tarantino, E., and Rząsa, K. (2020). Infrastructure of the spatial information in the European community (INSPIRE) based on examples of Italy and Poland. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(12):755, doi:10.3390/ijgi9120755.
39.
Ordinance (2020). Ordinance of the Minister of Development of August 18, 2020 on technical standards for performing geodetic situational and altitude measurements, as well as developing and transferring the results of such measurements to the state geodetic and cartographic resource. Act. Journal of Laws, 2020, Item 1429, Poland.
40.
Ostapchuk, I., Gagalyuk, T., and Curtiss, J. (2021). Post-acquisition integration and growth of farms: the case of Ukrainian agroholdings. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 24(4):615–636, doi:10.22434/IFAMR2020.0188.
41.
Piasecka, A. (2017). A characterization of the real estate market. Central and Eastern European Journal of Management and Economics, 5(4):169–180, doi:10.29015/ceejme.655.
42.
Przewięźlikowska, A. (2020). Legal aspects of synchronising data on real property location in Polish cadastre and land and mortgage register. Land Use Policy, 95:104606, doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104606.
43.
Ritter, M., Hüttel, S., Odening, M., and Seifert, S. (2020). Revisiting the relationship between land price and parcel size in agriculture. Land Use Policy, 97:104771, doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104771.
44.
Roić, M., Križanović, J., and Pivac, D. (2021). An approach to resolve inconsistencies of data in the cadastre. Land, 10(1):70, doi:10.3390/land10010070.
45.
Sisman, S., Akar, A. U., and Yalpir, S. (2023). The novelty hybrid model development proposal for mass appraisal of real estates in sustainable land management. Survey Review, 55(388):1–20, doi:10.1080/00396265.2021.1996797.
46.
Szopińska, K., Balawejder, M., and Warchoł, A. (2022). National legal regulations and location of noise barriers along the Polish highway. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 109:103359, doi:10.1016/j.trd.2022.103359.
47.
Thompson, R. J. (2015). A model for the creation and progressive improvement of a digital cadastral data base. Land Use Policy, 49:565–576, doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.12.016.
48.
Walacik, M., Renigier-Biłozor, M., Chmielewska, A., and Janowski, A. (2020). Property sustainable value versus highest and best use analyzes. Sustainable Development, 28(6):1755–1772, doi:10.1002/sd.2122.
49.
Yildiz, Ü., Kocaman, S., Zevenbergen, J., and Gürel, M. (2022). Possible negative legal impacts on cadastral work due to lack of perception on spatial uncertainty. In 27th FIG Congress 2022: Volunteering for the future-Geospatial excellence for a better living, 11–15 Sept 2022, Warsaw, Poland.
| eISSN: | 2391-8152 |
| ISSN: | 2391-8365 |
© 2006-2024 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
