ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Construction of 3D models of the Cracow Fortress Powder Magazine and determination of their accuracy using photogrammetric and terrestrial scanning methods
1
Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Geodesy, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Mickiewicza 24/28, 30-120, Krakow, Poland
These authors had equal contribution to this work
A - Research concept and design; B - Collection and/or assembly of data; C - Data analysis and interpretation; D - Writing the article; E - Critical revision of the article; F - Final approval of article
Submission date: 2025-12-10
Final revision date: 2026-02-24
Acceptance date: 2026-03-31
Publication date: 2026-04-29
Corresponding author
Izabela Piech
Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Geodesy, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Mickiewicza 24/28, 30-120, Krakow, Poland
Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Geodesy, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Mickiewicza 24/28, 30-120, Krakow, Poland
Reports on Geodesy and Geoinformatics 2026;121:43-49
KEYWORDS
Cracow Fortress powder magazineterrestrial laser scanningclose-range digital photogrammetry3D modelling
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
This study presents a comparative analysis of two three-dimensional reconstruction models of Powder Magazine no. 2 of the 19h-century Cracow Fortress, developed using terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) and close-range digital photogrammetry to assess the suitability of both methods for the documentation and reconstruction of heritage structures, as well as to evaluate their geometric accuracy and visual quality. The investigated structure was scanned from four positions using a Leica ScanStation P40 and photographed using a Canon EOS 400D camera. Based on the acquired point clouds, two 3D models were generated: a TLS-based model in Autodesk Revit and a photogrammetric model in Trimble SketchUp, both at Level of Detail (LOD) 200. Accuracy assessment was conducted in CloudCompare using the Cloud-to-Cloud (C2C) method, supplemented by visual and historical comparisons. The results show high geometric consistency between the datasets (with deviations below 0.2 m) and confirm the effectiveness and complementarity of both techniques in the documentation of cultural heritage. The developed models provide valuable material for scientific research, conservation planning, education, and digital heritage presentation.
REFERENCES (27)
1.
Balsa-Barreiro J., Fritsch D. (2018). Generation of visually aesthetic and detailed 3D models of historical cities by using laser scanning and digital photogrammetry. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage. 8: 57–64-57–64. doi:10.1016/j.daach.2017.12.001.
2.
Bitelli G., Dellapasqua M., Girelli V. A., Sbaraglia S., Tini M. A. (2017). Historical photogrammetry and terrestrial laser scanning for the 3D virtual reconstruction of destroyed structures: A case study in Italy. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. XLII-5/W1: 113–119-113–119. doi:10.5194/isprs-archives-xlii-5-w1-113-2017.
3.
Bolognesi M., Furini A., Russo V., Pellegrinelli A., Russo P. (2014). Accuracy of cultural heritage 3D models by RPAS and terrestrial photogrammetry. The international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences. 40: 113–119-113–119. doi:10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-5-113-2014.
4.
Borkowski A., Józków G. (2012). Ocena dokładności modelu 3D zbudowanego na podstawie danych skaningu laserowego – przykład Zamku Piastów Śląskich w Brzegu (Evaluation of the accuracy of a 3D model created from laser scanning data – the example of the Silesian Piast Castle in Brzeg). Archiwum Fotogrametrii, Kartografii i Teledetekcji. 23: 37–47-37–47.
5.
Chevrier C., Maillard Y., Perrin J. P. (2009). A method for the 3D modelling of historic monuments: The case of a gothic abbey. HAL SHS.
6.
Elkhrachy I. (2019). Modeling and Visualization of Three Dimensional Objects Using Low-Cost Terrestrial Photogrammetry. International Journal of Architectural Heritage. 14 (10): 1456–1467-1456–1467. doi:10.1080/15583058.2019.1613454.
7.
Giżyńska J., Komorowska E., Kowalczyk M. (2022). The comparison of photogrammetric and terrestrial laser scanning methods in the documentation of small cultural heritage object – case study. Journal of Modern Technologies for Cultural Heritage Preservation. 1 (1).
8.
Guarnieri A., Remondino F., Vettore A., others. (2004). Photogrammetry and ground-based laser scanning: assessment of metric accuracy of the 3D model of Pozzoveggiani Church. FIG Working Week; TS26 Positioning and Measurement Technologies and Practises II – Laser Scanning and Photogrammetry.
9.
Guidi G., Beraldin J. A., Atzeni C. (2004). High-Accuracy 3-D Modeling of Cultural Heritage: The Digitizing of Donatello’s “Maddalena”. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. 13 (3): 370–380-370–380. doi:10.1109/tip.2003.822592.
10.
Guidi G., Russo M., Ercoli S., Remondino F., Rizzi A., Menna F. (2009). A Multi-Resolution Methodology for the 3D Modeling of Large and Complex Archeological Areas. International Journal of Architectural Computing. 7 (1): 39–55-39–55. doi:10.1260/147807709788549439.
11.
Głowacka A., Pluta M. (2016). Zaawansowane modelowanie 3D i teksturowanie w środowisku Bentley Microstation V8i (Advanced 3D modeling and texturing in the Bentley MicroStation V8i environment). Wydział Inżynierii Środowiska i Geodezji, Uniwersytet Rolniczy w Krakowie.
12.
Jo Y. H., Hong S. (2019). Three-dimensional digital documentation of cultural heritage site based on the convergence of terrestrial laser scanning and unmanned aerial vehicle photogrammetry. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 8 (2): 53-53. doi:10.3390/ijgi8020053.
13.
Kwoczyńska B., Nowak K., Woźniak K. (2023). 3D modelling of historic buildings based on integrated data from airborne and terrestrial laser scanning. Geomatics, Landmanagement and Landscape. (4). doi:10.15576/gll/2023.4.259.
14.
Luhmann T., Chizhova M., Gorkovchuk D. (2020). Fusion of UAV and Terrestrial Photogrammetry with Laser Scanning for 3D Reconstruction of Historic Churches in Georgia. Drones. 4 (3): 53-53. doi:10.3390/drones4030053.
15.
Maghiar M., Maldonado G., Newsome S., Clendenen J., Jackson M. (2016). Accuracy Comparison of 3D Structural Models Produced via Close-Range Photogrammetry and Laser Scanning. Construction Research Congress 2016. 780–789-780–789. doi:10.1061/9780784479827.079.
16.
Mikulski M. (2024). Podbrzusze twierdzy. Wojskowość austriacka i austro-węgierska na terenie Podgórza i okolic w latach 1850-1918 (The Lower Fortifications. Austrian and Austro-Hungarian Military Presence in Podgórze and the Surrounding Area, 1850–1918). (accessed on April 2026), ://www.academia.edu/31084440/PODBRZUSZE_TWIERDZY_WOJSKOWO%C5%9A%C4%86_AUSTRIACKA_I_AUSTRO_W%C4%98GIERSKA_NA_TERENIE_PODG%C3%93RZA_I_OKOLIC_pdf.
17.
Nazim A., Zidek K., Lazorik P., Pitel J. (2024). Assessment of photogrammetry techniques for 3D model acquisition: A comparative study on the accuracy and suitability of scanned models compared to CAD references. MM Science Journal. doi:10.17973/MMSJ.2024_11_2024029.
18.
Novel C., Keriven R., Poux F., Graindorge P. (2015). Comparing aerial photogrammetry and 3D laser scanning methods for creating 3D models of complex objects. Capturing Reality Forum. Bentley Systems, Salzburg.
19.
Saad S., Ammad S., Rasheed K., Balbehaith M., Qureshi A. H., Bashir M. T. (2023). Enhancing Construction Management In Restoration Through BIM-Assisted Photogrammetric 3D Model Accuracy Assessment. 2023 International Conference on Sustaining Heritage: Innovative and Digital Approaches (ICSH). 100–103-100–103. doi:10.1109/icsh57060.2023.10482845.
20.
Scianna A., Gaglio G. F., La Guardia M. (2020). Digital photogrammetry, TLS survey and 3D modelling for VR and AR applications in CH. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. XLIII-B2-2020: 901–909-901–909. doi:10.5194/isprs-archives-xliii-b2-2020-901-2020.
21.
Se S., Jasiobedzki P. (2006). Photo-realistic 3D model reconstruction. Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006. 3076–3082-3076–3082. doi:10.1109/robot.2006.1642169.
22.
Shashi M., Jain K. (2007). Use of photogrammetry in 3D modeling and visualization of buildings. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences. 2 (2): 37–40-37–40.
23.
Skrzypczak I., Oleniacz G., Leśniak A., Zima K., Mrówczyńska M., Kazak J. K. (2022). Scan-to-BIM method in construction: assessment of the 3D buildings model accuracy in terms inventory measurements. Building Research & Information. 50 (8): 859–880-859–880. doi:10.1080/09613218.2021.2011703.
24.
Stal C., De Wulf A., De Maeyer P., Goossens R., Nuttens T. (2012). Evaluation of the accuracy of 3D data acquisition techniques for the documentation of cultural heritage. 3rd International EARSeL workshop on the Advances in Remote Sensing for Archaeology and Cultural Heritage Management.
25.
Surmen H. K. (2023). Photogrammetry for 3D reconstruction of objects: Effects of geometry, texture and photographing. Image Analysis and Stereology. 42 (2): 51–63-51–63. doi:10.5566/ias.2887.
26.
Zachos A., Anagnostopoulos C. N. (2023). Using terrestrial laser scanning, unmanned aerial vehicles and mixed reality methodologies for digital survey, 3D modelling and historical recreation of religious heritage monuments. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.01380.
27.
Zarnowski A., Banaszek A., Banaszek S. (2015). Application of technical measures and software in constructing photorealistic 3D models of historical building using ground-based and aerial (UAV) digital images. Reports on Geodesy and Geoinformatics. 99: 54–63-54–63. doi:10.2478/rgg-2015-0012.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 2391-8152 |
| ISSN: | 2391-8365 |
© 2006-2026 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
